RADICAL GOVERNANCE, INNOVATIVE MODELS AND ALTERNATIVES TO TRADITIONAL GOVERNANCE
A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15189632Keywords:
radical governance, inovative models, self-management, radical democracy, brazilAbstract
This article explores the concept of radical governance as an alternative to traditional models, analyzing its theoretical foundations, innovative models such as self-management and holacracy, and the theory of radical democracy as a basis. Through case studies in Brazil, including worker-recovered companies, EPPO Brasil, and the Workers' Party, the article compares radical governance with traditional governance, highlighting their divergences, advantages, and challenges. The appropriate research methodology for investigating the adoption of radical governance is discussed, emphasizing the combination of qualitative case studies and quantitative methods. The article concludes that radical governance offers a path towards more democratic, participatory, and adaptable organizational models, with significant implications for management and organization.
References
AALI, M.; GHAZANFARI, M.; POURSADEGH, N.; POUREZZAT, A. Methodology of governance studies. Mar. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389651909_Methodology_of_Governance_Studies. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
AIHR. Self managed teams. 31 mar. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.aihr.com/hr-glossary/self-managed-teams/#:~:text=Self%20managed%20teams%20are%20groups,work%20to%20achieve%20set%20goals. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
ANTÔNIO, A.; MORAES, M. Desafios para construção de uma governança de IA no setor público brasileiro. 24 mar. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.jota.info/artigos/desafios-para-construcao-de-uma-governanca-de-ia-no-setor-publico-brasileiro. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
ARAUJO, F. S.; OLIVEIRA, V. N.; ALVAREZ, D.; COSTA, H. Worker-recovered companies in Brazil: self-management process assessment by applying multi-criteria decision support tools. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 2, p. 249–264, 2017. DOI: 10.14488/BJOPM.2017.v14.n2.a13. Disponível em: https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V14N2A13. Acesso em: 1 abr. 2025.
ARAUJO, V. C. A conceituação de governabilidade e governança, da sua relação entre si e com o conjunto da reforma do Estado e do seu aparelho. 2002. Disponível em: https://saude.es.gov.br/Media/sesa/Descentraliza%C3%A7%C3%A3o/Araujo.pdf. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
BALDWIN, K.; HOLZINGER, K. Traditional political institutions and democracy: reassessing their compatibility and accountability. 2019. Disponível em: https://d-nb.info/1220634018/34. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
BRUNO-FARIA, M. F.; FONSECA, M. V. A. Cultura de inovação: conceitos e modelos teóricos. RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea, Rio de Janeiro, v. 18, n. 4, p. 372-396, jul./ago. 2014.
BULLOCK, J. B. Predicting public support for artificial intelligence in government. Social Science Computer Review, v. 37, n. 5, p. 610-626, 2019.
CARLOMAGNO, M. Governança da inovação em cenários de incerteza. 11 fev. 2025. Disponível em: https://mitsloanreview.com.br/governanca-da-inovacao-em-cenarios-de-incerteza/. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
CASTORIADIS, C. A instituiçăo imaginária da sociedade. Rio de Janeiro, Paz e Terra, 1986.
DAHLBERG, L; SIAPERA, E. Radical democracy and the Internet: interrogating theory and practice. Springer, 2007.
DAMANPOUR, F. Organizational Innovation. 22 ago. 2017. Disponível em: https://oxfordre.com/business/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-19. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
DJOCK, E. 10 methods for building a sustainable innovation governance framework. 19 out. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.itonics-innovation.com/blog/powerful-innovation-governance-methods. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
FREY, T. Super democracy 2: the radical rebirth of governance in the U.S. - futurist speaker. 6 mar. 2025. Disponível em: https://futuristspeaker.com/futurist-thomas-frey-insights/super-democracy-2-the-radical-rebirth-of-governance-in-the-u-s/. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2019.
GRX, L. 1/2 — A few limits of traditional organizations and their governance systems. 2 fev. 2017. Disponível em: https://medium.com/@LuigiGrx/1-2-a-few-limits-of-traditional-organizations-and-their-governance-systems-d452fe6ea41f. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
HOCK-DÖPGEN, M.; CLAUSS, T.; SCHULZ, E. The impact of organizational culture on a firm's capability to innovate the business model. R&D Management, v. 46, n. 3, p. 433-450, 2016.
HU, Y.; SHU, S. Exploring the dynamics of governance: An examination of traditional governance and governance innovation in the United States professional sports leagues. 14 jun. 2024. Disponível em: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11259793/. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
HUANG, M; RUST, R. T. Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, v. 24, n. 1, p. 2-14, 2021.
INVENTTA. Inovação nos modelos de governança? É possível!. 21 jun. 2024. Disponível em: https://inventta.net/inovacao-nos-modelos-de-governanca/. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
JUVENAL. T. Empresas recuperadas por trabalhadores em regime de autogestão: reflexões à luz do caso brasileiro. dez. 2006. Disponível em: https://web.bndes.gov.br/bib/jspui/bitstream/1408/12353/2/RB%2026%20Empresas%20Recuperadas%20por%20Trabalhadores%20em%20Regime%20de%20Autogest%C3%A3o_Reflex%C3%B5es%20%C3%A0%20Luz%20do%20Caso%20Brasileiro_P_BD.pdf. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
KECK, M. Brazil's PT: socialism as radical democracy. 25 set. 2007. Disponível em: https://nacla.org/article/brazil%27s-pt-socialism-radical-democracy. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
LALOR, J. Cyclopaedia of political science, political economy, and of the political history of the United States: volume 3. 1893. Disponível em: (https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=l-J3vOPWd50C&pg=GBS.PP12&hl=pt). Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
LALOUX, F. Reinventing organizations: a guide to creating organizations inspired by the next stage of human consciousness. 20 fev. 2014. Brussels: Nelson Parker, 2014.
MANAGEMENT KITS. Decentralized organizations: traditional and radical approaches. 21 mar. 2020. Disponível em: https://managementkits.com/blog/2020/3/21/decentralized-organizations-traditional-and-radical-approaches. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
MENEZES, D. Self-management report in Brazil: technical concepts and challenges. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.ciriec.uliege.be/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/WP2019-19.pdf. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
MINAAR, J. EPPO: pioneering smart cities and sustainable solutions in Brazil | Corporate Rebels. 1 jul. 2024. Disponível em: https://www.corporate-rebels.com/blog/eppo-pioneering-smart-cities-and-sustainable-solutions-in-brazil. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
PAES, A. Governança corporativa: conceito, princípios, boas práticas e sua relação com a inovação. 16 jul. 2020. Disponível em: https://distrito.me/blog/governanca-corporativa-inovacao/. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
PERSONIO. Holacracy: the key to succeeding without hierarchy? 2025. Disponível em: https://www.personio.com/hr-lexicon/holacracy/. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
POSNER, E. A.; WEYL, E. G. Radical Markets: Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just Society. Princeton University Press, 2018.
RECLAIM.AI. What are self-managed teams? top benefits vs. disadvantages. 26 jul. 2023. Disponível em: https://reclaim.ai/blog/self-managed-teams. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
RIVERO-VILLAR, A.; VIEYRA, A. Traditional governance in the coproduction of urban resilience: institutional enablers and political constraints. 29 jan. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.ijurr.org/article/traditional-governance-in-the-coproduction-of-urban-resilience-institutional-enablers-and-political-constraints/. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
ROBERTSON, B. Holacracy: the new management system for a rapidly changing world. Henry Holt & Co., 2015.
ROGERS, D. Fuja da governança tradicional e inove para inovar - MIT Sloan Management Review Brasil. 1 nov. 2023. Disponível em: https://mitsloanreview.com.br/fuja-da-governanca-tradicional-e-inove-para-inovar/. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
ROSSINGOL, N. Leading from within: a guide to self-managed teams - Runn. 21 nov. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.runn.io/blog/self-managed-teams. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
RUMAGE, J. Holacracy: what is it, and how does it work? | Built In. 13 jun. 2024. Disponível em: https://builtin.com/articles/holacracy. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
TORRES, R. Governabilidade, governança e poder informal: um problema central de sociologia política. Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 153–171, 2016. DOI: 10.15448/1984-7289.2016.1.19581. Disponível em: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/civitas/article/view/19581. Acesso em: 1 abr. 2025.
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON. Political science and public policy: research methods - Library Guides. 2025. Disponível em: https://guides.lib.uw.edu/c.php?g=341336&p=8052599. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
WELLBEING ECONOMY ALLIANCE. 2022. Non-state forms of governance. Disponível em: https://weall.org/resource/non-state-forms-of-governance. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 O autor.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
| Minas Gerais 
| Brasil 
